When those who serve the State are the ones under investigation: MOSAC exposes a broken system
The Legrottaglie case and the “necessary act” paradox
The tragic death of Brigadier Carlo Legrottaglie and the arrest of his murderers sparked fresh controversy. The police officers who tracked down the killers and were involved in a shootout—which resulted in the death of one of the suspects—are now under investigation for involuntary manslaughter. All because of what the media calls a “necessary act”, a term not even found in the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.
Misleading language turns officers into suspects
There is no such thing as a “necessary act” in criminal law. It’s a media-created expression that confuses public perception and unfairly paints police officers as criminals. The correct term is a “guaranteed act”, an investigation phase in which the suspect’s lawyer has the right to be present. When an officer is entered into the criminal register without objective evidence, it becomes an abuse of procedure with serious legal, emotional and professional consequences.
Legal costs too high, government funds too low
Officers facing investigations must pay enormous legal fees out of pocket. The Security Decree only provides €10,000 per trial phase and a total of €860,000 across all cases, which is far from enough. Technical reports alone can drain the available funds. Many trade unions and colleagues organize fundraising campaigns just to ensure accused officers are not left alone and unsupported.
Morale and operational efficiency at risk
These investigations have a devastating psychological effect. Officers begin to ask themselves if being proactive is worth the risk of becoming a suspect. The MOSAC makes it clear: this is not a war against the judiciary, but a call for clarity, fairness, and faster procedures—especially for those who risk their lives to protect others.
Political responsibility and concrete reform
The MOSAC demands real reform from the political system: not to weaken the judiciary, but to support officers with full legal and financial protection. Automatism must be avoided. Objective verification is essential. The MOSAC also calls for economic measures, like automatic biennial salary increases for officers over 50 still in service—just like top civil servants receive.
FAQ
1. What is the “necessary act”?
It’s not part of the criminal code—it’s a misleading media term used to justify opening investigations.
2. Why are police officers investigated even when acting lawfully?
To preserve legal guarantees, but without objective clues, this becomes an abuse of process.
3. What happens when an officer is added to the suspect registry?
They face stress, legal fees, potential suspension, and public blame.
4. Are there any government funds for legal defense?
Yes, but they are limited and often insufficient.
5. What does MOSAC demand?
Clearer laws, faster procedures, and full coverage of legal expenses.
6. Is this a political campaign against the judiciary?
No. It’s about protecting law enforcement while respecting institutions.
7. What about older officers still on duty?
MOSAC proposes automatic salary increases every two years.
8. Is there a shortage of police in Italy?
Yes, and it’s expected to worsen in 2025–2026.
9. What are the psychological effects on officers?
They feel abandoned, demoralized, and fear repercussions for doing their job.
10. How can we change this narrative?
Through transparent laws, honest journalism, and inclusive political dialogue.
Leave a Reply