Referendum showdown: “The government is sabotaging the vote”, Schlein attacks while CISL distances itself

The leader of the Democratic Party accuses the executive of suppressing the referendum, while the trade union questions its effectiveness

Schlein fires back: “The government is sabotaging the vote”

Elly Schlein, leader of the Democratic Party, delivered a fiery accusation in an interview with La Stampa: “The government is sabotaging the referendums.” She claims that the executive is deliberately trying to hinder citizen participation in five key ballots regarding citizenship, labor rights, and social protections.

Schlein states the PD’s position clearly: “Full support for all five questions.” A strong message, meant to mobilize voters and call out what she describes as “unacceptable behavior from state institutions.” She also criticizes Senate President Ignazio La Russa, calling it “serious” that “the second highest office in the State” encouraged people not to vote.

Citizenship and precarious work under the spotlight

One of the most pressing issues is the right to Italian citizenship. Schlein is clear: “Those who are born or raised in Italy are Italians. While we wait for a complete reform, we must vote yes to fix an unjust law.”

She also emphasizes the importance of workers’ rights: “Voting yes is crucial to fight job insecurity and improve workplace safety.” Internally, the Democratic Party reports that over 90% of its base agrees with the referendums’ proposals, demonstrating strong alignment.

CISL backs out: “I won’t be voting”

On the union front, however, comes a clear rejection. Daniela Fumarola, General Secretary of CISL, announced in Corriere della Sera that she won’t participate in the vote on June 8–9. “I believe the referendum is not the right tool,” she said.

According to Fumarola, Italy needs a “comprehensive reform involving Parliament and social partners.” She also fears the risk of political polarization, warning that the vote could become “just a matter of partisanship,” while the world of labor has evolved.

A clash of visions on direct democracy

Schlein and Fumarola’s contrasting stances represent two opposing visions of direct democracy. One sees referendums as a powerful way to mobilize and correct injustice. The other sees them as outdated and risky, ill-suited for complex reforms.

One thing is certain: the June 8–9 referendums will be not only a test of the issues at hand, but also a litmus test for civic engagement in Italy.